A trend that has encompassed many sectors of real estate has been adapting and re-using buildings for a variety of uses. Warehouses are being converted into loft apartments. Grocery stores are transformed into charter schools. Churches have even been converted to breweries. This sweeping trend has taken old dilapidated un-used buildings and converted them into buildings with a new purpose.

The benefits of adaptive/re-use are innumerable to not only the building owner but also to the local market and the city. Residents see an improvement to their neighborhood as well as an increase in property values. Cities benefit from increased tax income. The property owner benefits from financial incentives from the city, potentially lower construction costs and entry to the market, and an architecturally unique building, in most cases. Furthermore, the adaptive/re-use method is a sustainable one that doesn’t require additional resources that are required to build a building from the ground up.
The challenges with adaptive/re-use are plentiful. The prospective project may have certain legal and zoning hurdles not to mention significant environmental hazards such as underground gas tanks. Moreover, adaptive/re-use projects are limited to the existing physical characteristics of a building and may have structural issues that restrict the use of the project.
Adaptive/re-use projects are an important part of the real estate industry and provide an opportunity for forward thinking adventurous developers. They also convert oft forgotten areas of cities into vibrant and unique neighborhoods.
Transit Oriented Development
As residents desire a lifestyle less dependent on a vehicle, the real estate responds in kind with a new style of development – one that is dependent on public transit. This development is known as transit oriented development (TOD). It combines various sectors of real estate that create convenience for the consumer. A variety of retail, restaurants, commercial office, and residential units are built around modes of public transportation such as rail and bus. The goal is to provide the consumer with essentially everything thing they could need while having access to other parts of the city, or cities, via public transit. TOD’s also aim to reduce the use and dependence of personal vehicles.
Such developments are becoming numerous across the country as the trend catches on. However, they may not succeed in every market. Dallas’ most prominent TOD, Mockingbird Station, has had a mixed reception. By most real estate accounts it’s considered a success. Residential units remain occupied; the address is desired by office tenants and consumers flock to the many shopping and dining options. Ironically enough, the DART rail system is generally an afterthought since most occupants and users arrive via a personal vehicle. This is not to say Mockingbird Station has been a failure, it’s anything but. The question now becomes is the success related to being TOD or because of the already strong neighborhood. If the DART station was fully removed would Mockingbird Station cease to exist? Unfortunately, that answer is no. Mockingbird Station is situated a mile north of downtown Dallas on a major highway and surrounded by many affluent neighborhoods such as Highland Park, University Park, the M-Streets, Knox-Henderson and Lakewood. The DART station contributes practically nothing to its success. Its success falls back on the age old answer of how to succeed in real estate – location, location, location.
Furthermore, residents of the prospective TOD must be willing to embrace a non-car lifestyle and I don’t think Texans are quite ready to give up their vehicles. Cities such as Portland, Vancouver, Seattle and Edmonton are prime examples of cities who embrace the TOD lifestyle with open arms.I am all for TOD’s as long as the TOD fits the needs and wants of the surrounding residents or even provide more incentive to abandon the personal vehicle all together.







